The Evolution of Subatomic Structure: From Indivisible Spheres to the Nuclear Model | Chemistry SHS 1 SEM 1 WEEK 3 (WASSCE & NaCCA Aligned)

The Scientific Process: Challenging the Picture of Matter

The history of chemistry is a story of continuous refinement. For centuries, the question of the fundamental nature of matter remained a philosophical puzzle. Our modern understanding of the atom—that tiny, complex structure that defines all elements—did not emerge fully formed. Instead, it was developed through a systematic process of experimentation, hypothesis, and, crucially, **refutation**. Each new discovery challenged the established ‘picture,’ forcing scientists to build better, more descriptive models.

Dalton’s Atomic Theory: The Indivisible Sphere (c. 1803)

John Dalton, often considered the father of modern atomic theory, provided the first truly scientific framework for understanding atoms. His work was foundational because it explained the observed Laws of Chemical Combination (like the Law of Conservation of Mass).

The four core postulates of Dalton’s theory were:

• All matter is composed of extremely tiny, indivisible particles called atoms.
• Atoms of the same element are identical in mass and properties.
• Atoms cannot be created or destroyed; they are merely rearranged during chemical reactions.
• Atoms of different elements combine in simple, whole-number ratios to form compounds.

Dalton’s model, often dubbed the **Billiard Ball Model**, depicted the atom as a simple, uniform, solid sphere.

However, scientific evidence eventually revealed critical weaknesses in Dalton’s initial postulates:

• **Indivisibility:** The discovery of subatomic particles (protons, neutrons, and electrons) showed that atoms are indeed divisible.
• **Identical Atoms:** The existence of isotopes—atoms of the same element with different masses (due to varying numbers of neutrons)—refuted the claim that all atoms of an element are identical.

Despite these weaknesses, Dalton provided the indispensable starting point for all subsequent atomic theories.

Thomson’s Discovery: The Embedded Electron (c. 1897)

The next major shift occurred with J.J. Thomson’s investigation into electrical discharge in gases, using the **Cathode Ray Tube (CRT) Experiment**.

In this experiment, Thomson observed rays moving from the negative electrode (cathode) to the positive electrode (anode). When he applied an external electric field, he found that these cathode rays were consistently deflected toward the positive plate.

This led to a stunning conclusion: the ray must be composed of tiny, negatively charged particles. Since the ray originated from the atoms of the gas and the metal electrodes, these negative particles—which he named **electrons**—must be components *inside* the atom. This discovery shattered Dalton’s idea of the atom as an indivisible solid ball.

Thomson proposed the **Plum Pudding Model** (or Raisin Bun Model). He theorized that the atom was a positively charged cloud or sphere, with the much smaller negative electrons scattered randomly throughout, like pieces of dried fish distributed within a bowl of smooth, solid **gari foto**. The positive charge was thought to be uniform across the entire sphere, neutralizing the negative charges of the electrons and keeping the atom electrically neutral overall.

The primary weakness of the Plum Pudding Model was that it offered no mechanical explanation for *how* the charges were organized, setting the stage for the next great experiment.

Rutherford’s Nuclear Model: The Empty Space (c. 1911)

Ernest Rutherford, a student of Thomson, designed the famous **Alpha Particle Scattering Experiment** (or Gold Foil Experiment) to test the validity of his mentor’s Plum Pudding Model.

Rutherford predicted that if the atom was a soft, uniform mass of positive charge like pudding, then high-speed, positively charged alpha particles shot at an extremely thin sheet of gold foil should pass straight through with only minor deflections. It would be like shooting tiny pellets through a sheet of thin tissue paper.

The results, however, were revolutionary:

• **Observation 1:** The vast majority (over 99%) of the alpha particles passed straight through the gold foil, behaving exactly as predicted.
• **Observation 2 (The Shock):** A very small fraction of alpha particles (about 1 in 8,000) were deflected at very large angles, sometimes even bouncing directly back towards the source.

Rutherford described this finding as being “almost as incredible as if you fired a 15-inch shell at a piece of tissue paper and it came back and hit you.”

His brilliant interpretation led to the **Nuclear Model** of the atom:

• The atom is composed mainly of **empty space** (explaining why most particles passed through).
• All the positive charge and nearly all the mass of the atom are concentrated in a tiny, dense central region called the **nucleus**.
• The negative electrons orbit this nucleus in the surrounding empty space.

The Rutherford model was a colossal leap, but it was still flawed. Its major weakness was rooted in classical physics: if electrons orbit the nucleus, they are constantly accelerating. Classical electromagnetic theory dictated that accelerating charged particles must emit energy and spiral inward, crashing into the nucleus almost instantly. Rutherford’s model could not explain the **stability** of the atom, nor could it explain the observed line spectra of elements. This mystery would necessitate the next major theoretical breakthrough: the quantum model.

NaCCA ALIGNED
For Teachers: Premium Prep Package. For Students: Premium Handouts.